Riots in Kohat and Forgotten Exodus: Kashmir Exodus 1.0
Riots in Kohat and Exodus of 1924
The Riots in Kohat, which erupted from September 9-11, 1924, mark a distressing episode of communal unrest in colonial India. This conflict primarily saw the Muslim majority in the town of Kohat—now part of Pakistan—clashing with the Hindu and Sikh minorities. Over these three tumultuous days, widespread violence resulted in substantial loss of life, extensive property damage, and the forced displacement of almost the entire Hindu and Sikh communities from the area.
Historically, Hindus are known for their peaceful disposition, often remaining non-confrontational unless severely provoked. Sikhs, on the other hand, have been recognized as protectors, historically positioned as a defense force safeguarding not only their own rights but also those of their Hindu brethren against oppression. Despite these inherent inclinations towards peace and protection, the Riots in Kohat underscore how deeply religious divisions were exacerbated by the British colonial rule’s divisive policies and the complex internal dynamics within India’s own political leadership, especially the Indian National Congress.
This blog seeks to delve into the underlying causes of these riots, examining the roles played by key political entities and the lasting impact on communal relations in India. We will explore how historical patterns of conflict have shaped the interactions between different religious groups and consider the broader implications of such divisions on the subcontinent’s socio-political landscap.
Historical Background
Demographic Composition and Historical Significance
Before the tumultuous events of the Riots in Kohat, Kohat was a relatively small town strategically located in the North-West Frontier Province of British India, now in Pakistan. The population was predominantly Muslim, with significant Hindu and Sikh minorities. Historically, Kohat was important due to its geographical location near various tribal areas and its role as a garrison town, which influenced its socio-political dynamics significantly.
Political Climate in Early 20th Century India
The early 20th century was a period of intense political activity and social upheaval in India. The British colonial administration’s policies often exacerbated communal tensions, a strategy that many historians describe as “divide and rule.” These policies were aimed at creating and deepening divisions to prevent unified opposition against the British rule.
At the same time, the Indian National Congress, founded in 1885, initially emerged as a platform for dialogue between the British and the Indian elite, aiming to discuss and promote moderate reforms. Over time, however, it evolved to take on a relatively assertive role, actively advocating for India’s independence and becoming the principal voice against colonial rule in India. However, its strategies and leadership were often the subject of intense debate and division, particularly concerning its handling of communal issues. The Congress’s support for the Khilafat Movement—a campaign launched by Indian Muslims with full support of Congress led by Gandhi to protect the Ottoman Caliphate, which had symbolic importance to Muslims worldwide—exemplifies the complex interplay of communal and political motivations during this era. This alignment led to catastrophic consequences, including the massacre and rape of tens of thousands of Hindus in Malabar, where Gandhi and the British remained largely silent observers. This tragic event marked the beginning of a persistent and widening divide between the two communities, setting the stage for both national liberation and communal strife.
The Onset of the Riots in Kohat
Following the rising communal tensions seen in events like Malabar, the Riots in Kohat erupted in 1924. A minor altercation between Hindus and Muslims quickly escalated, fueled by rumors and provocative information, leading to widespread violence.
The Riots in Kohat began on September 9, 1924, ignited by a series of incidents that rapidly escalated into widespread communal violence. The initial trigger was reportedly a minor altercation between individuals from the Hindu and Muslim communities, which quickly spiraled out of control. The altercation was inflamed by rumors and the dissemination of provocative information, which is often cited in historical accounts as a catalyst for rapid escalation.
Detailed Account of Events
The Riots in Kohat of September 10-11 unfolded rapidly, with mobs forming early in the morning and swiftly escalating violence. Hindu and Sikh shops were looted, homes were set ablaze, and by the following day, several temples and gurdwaras had been targeted. The local administration, seemingly caught off guard, struggled to regain control as the deployed troops found themselves overwhelmed by the rioters, leading to a significant breakdown in order.
Amidst this chaos, the disproportionate impact on the Hindu and Sikh communities became starkly evident. These groups suffered heavily, with many casualties reported among them, highlighting their vulnerability and lack of preparedness. This pattern of violence not only sowed panic and fear but also signaled a potentially calculated response from the British administration.
Some historians argue that the British response—or lack thereof—was part of a broader strategy to deepen the communal divisions between Hindus and Muslims. By allowing the violence to escalate, the administration aimed to undermine the Indian National Congress (INC) and its efforts to unify various communities against colonial rule. This perspective suggests that the British tactics were deliberate, designed to ensure that Hindus would distance themselves from the INC, which was increasingly aligning with Muslim interests through movements like the Khilafat campaign. This strategic manipulation, aimed at hindering a unified nationalist movement, reveals the complexities of colonial power dynamics and the divisive policies that were employed to maintain control over the Indian subcontinent.
Escalation of Violence
The escalation of the riots was marked by the use of firearms, sticks, and stones as the conflict turned deadly. Historical accounts suggest that the local Muslim populace, some of whom were armed, played a significant role in the attacks on Hindu and Sikh residents, who largely tried to defend their families and properties but were often forced to flee.
Immediate Impacts on Local Communities
The immediate impact of the Riots in Kohat was devastating. Hundreds of Hindu and Sikh families were forced to flee Kohat, leaving behind their homes and livelihoods to seek refuge in safer areas or across the newly formed borders into what would soon become independent India. The exodus left deep scars in the community, dismantling decades of coexistence and mutual cultural enrichment.
The aftermath of the riots saw Kohat’s demographic landscape dramatically altered, with a significant reduction in the diversity that had characterized the town for generations. The departure of Hindus and Sikhs not only affected the social fabric but also the economy, as they had been integral to local trade and business. The riots served as a foreboding precursor to the larger-scale migrations and communal violence that would accompany the partition of India in 1947.
Role of the Congress and British in Fostering Communal Divides
British Policies and the Divide and Rule Strategy
The British colonial strategy in India frequently employed a “divide and rule” approach, which exacerbated religious tensions and deepened divisions among India’s diverse communities. By categorizing Indian society into rigid religious and caste-based groupings, the British administration effectively manipulated existing minor tensions into significant communal divides. This policy was evident in administrative decisions, census classifications, and the British support for communal electorates under the Government of India Act of 1919, which allocated separate electorates for Muslims, Sikhs, and other groups, thereby institutionalizing religious differences.
Congress’s Role and the Khilafat Movement
The Indian National Congress, during this period, was attempting to forge a pan-Indian resistance against British rule. Its support for the Khilafat Movement (1919-1924) is a prime example of this effort. The movement was explicitly designed to defend the Ottoman Caliphate, a significant symbol of Islamic authority, and garnered the support of notable Congress leaders like Mahatma Gandhi. Critics argue that Gandhi’s support was a strategic act of appeasement, aimed at rallying Muslim support under the Congress banner. This move, according to critics, played into the hands of the British, who utilized such divisions as part of their larger divide and rule strategy to maintain control over India. However, the movement’s alignment with an overtly Islamic cause inadvertently intensified Hindu-Muslim divides. This association of Congress with the Khilafat campaign caused considerable unease among many Hindu members and supporters, who felt that their fundamental concerns were being marginalized in favor of appeasing Muslim interests. This perceived imbalance contributed to growing rifts within the community.
Contribution to the Rise in Hindu-Muslim Riots in Kohat
The dynamics of British policy combined with the Congress’s political maneuvers significantly contributed to the rise of Hindu-Muslim riots across India. The Riots in Kohat were partially a product of these larger national politics. The Khilafat Movement, while initially fostering a rare Hindu-Muslim unity, eventually led to polarizing repercussions. When the movement failed to achieve its goals, disillusionment and frustration among Muslims were directed towards the Hindus (which was nurtured by the British), who were seen as less committed to the cause. This breakdown in unity was exploited by communal leaders, leading to an increase in communal violence during the 1920s.
These strategies and political engagements set the stage not just for isolated events like the Kohat riots but also for the broader patterns of communal conflict that would culminate in the partition of India. The political legacy of the British and the ambiguous role played by the Congress in communal politics left enduring impacts on the subcontinent’s social fabric, the echoes of which were felt in the decades that followed.
The Khilafat Movement and Its Impact on Communal Relations
Overview of the Khilafat Movement
The Khilafat Movement was a political campaign launched by Muslims in India around 1919 to pressure the British government to preserve the authority of the Ottoman Sultan as the Caliph of Islam after World War I. This movement, principally driven by Congress under the leadership of Gandhi, was notably significant as it showcased one of the rare instances of Hindu-Muslim collaboration during India’s struggle for independence. The movement’s objectives resonated deeply with Indian Muslims, for whom the preservation of the Caliphate symbolized a united Islamic identity and sovereignty.
Support from Congress
Gandhi and other Congress leaders believed that by supporting the religious goals of Indian Muslims, they could strengthen the bonds between Muslims and Hindus and create a united front in the nationalistic struggle for independence.
Impact on Communal Relations
The Khilafat Movement, which commenced around 1919, initially fostered a significant bond between Hindus and Muslims, uniting them against British rule. However, despite the movement’s intent to strengthen communal ties through a shared struggle, underlying tensions remained, which were particularly highlighted by incidents such as the Moplah Rebellion in 1921. This event, occurring during the height of the movement, illustrated the precariousness of Hindu-Muslim unity, as economic and religious tensions escalated into violence.
Turning Points and Specific Incidents
The Moplah Rebellion of 1921 is a critical incident that underlines the complexities of communal relationships during the Khilafat Movement. Although the movement sought to align Hindu and Muslim interests, the rebellion featured violent clashes between Muslim Moplahs and their Hindu landlords. These clashes were driven by a mix of socio-economic grievances and religious fervor. Within the context of the movement, certain extremist elements within the Muslim community seized the opportunity to express their longstanding resentments against Hindus, whom they viewed as ‘kafir’ (non-believers). This illustrates how deeply intertwined socio-economic issues and religious ideologies can become, complicating communal dynamics.
While the Moplah massacre had already created a deep chasm between the two communities, the depth of this division multiplied when the Khilafat Movement ended. This rebellion, while a distinct and separate event, foreshadowed the later disillusionment among Muslims, which intensified after the formal conclusion of the Khilafat Movement and the abolition of the Caliphate in Turkey in 1924. The cessation of the movement solidified the fractures within the community, exacerbating the initial unity into increased polarization. These developments had already been indicated by the events in Kerala, demonstrating how earlier conflicts could predict and contribute to future communal divisions.
The fallout from the Moplah Rebellion and the Khilafat Movement significantly exacerbated communal tensions, influenced by both colonial policies and local political agendas. This worsening of relations paved the way for further communal unrest, such as the Riots in Kohat. The legacy of the Khilafat Movement reveals the inherent challenges in aligning religious and political objectives within the broader Indian independence movement. The deepening animosity from Muslims towards Hindus, which was cemented during these events, reflected in subsequent chapters of history, with the Kohat riots being a notable example.
Consequences of the Riots in Kohat
Short-Term Effects on the Local Population
The immediate aftermath of the Kohat riots was devastating for the local Hindu and Sikh communities. Many were forced to flee their homes to escape the violence, resulting in a significant demographic shift within the town. Properties were looted or destroyed, leaving economic ruin in their wake. The sense of security and community that had existed was severely disrupted, with many families never returning to Kohat, leading to a permanent alteration of the town’s social fabric.
Long-Term Effects on Communal Relationships
In the long term, the riots had a profound impact on communal relationships in Kohat and the surrounding areas. The violence deepened mistrust between the Muslim and Hindu-Sikh communities, which had repercussions extending far beyond the immediate locality. This event became a part of the collective memory of the region, influencing inter-community interactions for generations. The decrease in the Hindu and Sikh populations also shifted the cultural and economic dynamics of Kohat, as these communities had played significant roles in the local economy.
Policy Responses from British Authorities and Indian Leaders
The response of the British authorities to the riots drew significant criticism for its inefficacy, both contemporaneously and in later historical analyses. Initially slow to react, the British administration’s subsequent measures were deemed inadequate in effectively preventing or quelling the violence. Notably, the focus remained predominantly on military and police interventions without addressing the deeper communal tensions. Simultaneously, a covert policy of “divide and rule” was tacitly implemented, exacerbating the divisions without making overt moves to resolve the underlying issues fueling the unrest.
Indian leaders, particularly from the Congress, were compelled to reassess their strategies regarding Hindu-Muslim unity. The riots spurred Congress to more seriously consider the complexities of communalism in Indian politics. Leaders like Gandhi were criticized within and outside the Congress for their perceived failures to protect vulnerable communities or to anticipate the consequences of political alliances like the Khilafat Movement.
Broader Policy Implications
Following the Kohat riots and similar communal disturbances, there was a greater acknowledgment among Indian nationalist leaders of the need to address communal grievances as a part of the freedom struggle. This recognition influenced subsequent policies and approaches adopted by the Congress. However, the riots also underscored the challenges of overcoming deeply entrenched communal tensions, particularly among Muslims who often found it difficult to coexist harmoniously with non-Muslims. These difficulties were further compounded by the British government’s ongoing policies aimed at maintaining control over India through a strategy of divide and rule, which deliberately exacerbated these divisions. These dynamics eventually contributed to the partition of India, a decision justified by the British as a necessary response to such communal conflicts.
Reflections on Historical Lessons
Lessons on Communal Harmony and Political Manipulation
The Kohat riots offer critical insights into the delicate balance of communal harmony and the dangers of political manipulation. One of the key lessons from this event is the vulnerability of multi-ethnic societies to divisive politics, especially when political entities exploit existing religious or ethnic tensions for strategic purposes. The British colonial strategy of divide and rule not only exacerbated these tensions but also left a legacy of division that continued to haunt the region long after independence.
The role of the Indian National Congress in the Khilafat Movement and its aftermath illustrates the complexities of political alliances that cross communal lines. While initially seeming to bridge the Hindu-Muslim divide, the movement ultimately contributed to deeper communal rifts, highlighting the risks of politicizing religious identity in a highly diverse society. This incident teaches the importance of cautious and inclusive political engagement that genuinely addresses the concerns of all community stakeholders.
Informing Current Approaches to Communal Violence
Understanding the historical context of events like the Kohat riots can provide valuable lessons for contemporary policymakers and community leaders. These historical incidents reveal a pattern where political strategies utilized during colonial times appear to influence current political practices, particularly in exploiting communal divisions for electoral gains. This strategy, reminiscent of colonial “divide and rule” tactics, continues to be evident in the widespread use of vote bank politics by various Indian political parties.
Preventive Diplomacy: Proactive dialogue between communities is crucial to address grievances before they escalate into violence. Engaging in open and constructive conversations can help bridge communal gaps and foster mutual understanding.
Inclusive Governance: It is essential to ensure that all community groups feel represented and heard within the political process. Inclusive governance helps prevent feelings of alienation and marginalization, which are often exploited for electoral gains.
Educational Initiatives: Promoting education that emphasizes shared histories and the interdependence of diverse communities can counteract the divisive narratives often perpetuated for political advantage. Education can play a pivotal role in unifying various groups by highlighting commonalities and celebrating diversity.
The lessons learned from historical conflicts like the Kohat riots underscore the importance of proactive measures such as preventive diplomacy, inclusive governance, and educational initiatives. These strategies are crucial in mitigating the long-standing effects of colonial divide-and-rule policies, which still resonate in today’s political strategies. As we continue to confront these challenges, it becomes imperative to examine how these colonial legacies influence contemporary governance and communal relationships.
Continuing Practices of British Policies Post-Independence
The enduring influence of British colonial “divide and rule” tactics is evident in modern Indian politics, particularly in the use of vote bank strategies that exploit communal divisions for electoral gain. This reflection of colonial methods in contemporary governance highlights a significant challenge: transitioning from divisive politics to inclusive strategies that unify diverse communities. Recognizing these historical patterns allows leaders to critically assess and shift away from entrenched divisive practices towards fostering greater inclusivity and national unit.
Historical understanding can help deconstruct the rhetoric that inflames communal tensions today. Recognizing the patterns and triggers of past violence can empower leaders and activists to formulate responses that mitigate rather than exacerbate divisions. Insights into how these divisions are manipulated for political gains can guide the development of more cohesive and peaceful strategies in governance.
Applying Lessons to Political Rhetoric
The discourse surrounding communal and ethnic divisions can benefit from a historical perspective that advocates for unity and shared goals over division. Politicians and community leaders should be wary of using language that might inadvertently echo colonial-era tactics of division. Instead, fostering a narrative that emphasizes commonalities, cooperation, and mutual respect can help build bridges rather than walls between different community groups.
In summary, the Kohat riots not only provide a historical case study of the impacts of communal violence but also serve as a stark reminder of the ongoing need to cultivate and maintain peace in diverse societies. The lessons from Kohat are particularly pertinent in today’s globalized world, where ethnic and religious tensions continue to pose challenges to social harmony and political stability.
Comparative Analysis: Kohat Riots and Kashmiri Pandit Exodus
Background and Onset of Violence
The Kohat riots of 1924 and the exodus of Kashmiri Pandits in 1989 unfolded in contexts where aggressive actions by certain segments within the Muslim community played a central role. In Kohat, what began as a minor altercation was quickly escalated by elements within the local Muslim population, leveraging the situation to advance broader Islamic agendas. This pattern reoccurred in 1989 in Kashmir, where radicalized groups targeting the Pandit community were motivated by a similar agenda, exacerbating the violence and leading to widespread fear and displacement among the Pandits.
Government Response and Strategic Manipulation
In both instances, the response of the authorities was markedly inadequate. During the Kohat riots, the British administration’s minimal intervention has been interpreted by some as a calculated neglect, aimed at deepening the divisions and weakening the nationalist movement that was growing against colonial rule. Similarly, in Kashmir, the lack of effective measures by both state and central governments to protect the Pandits has been critically viewed as either a failure or a deliberate oversight, which facilitated the agenda of radical groups and resulted in the mass exodus of the Pandit community.
Similarities and Dissimilarities
While Kohat Exodus occurred under the supervision of British Divide and Rule policy Kashmiri Pandits’ Exodus occurred when India was said to be a free democracy and a secular nation. While the Exodus tremors were brewing under the watchful eyes of a product of nepotism, Rajiv Gandhi of Indian National Congress that continued to follow the British policy of divided and rule to keep their vote bank intact, it was executed when the presumably clean Prime Minister, VP Singh was fomenting another problem- implementation of Mandal Commission reports where at least 62 people died.
It reflected that India was not independent even after 52 years of indepe Similarities and Dissimilarities.
While the Kohat exodus unfolded under the British colonial regime, marked by a deliberate “Divide and Rule” policy aimed at weakening Indian nationalist movements through communal divisions, the exodus of the Kashmiri Pandits occurred in a dramatically different political context—India as a free democracy claiming secularism. Yet, despite these differing backdrops, both events were deeply influenced by political maneuvers.
The Kohat exodus was a direct result of the British policy that incited and exploited religious tensions. In contrast, the exodus of the Kashmiri Pandits in 1989 happened under the watch of Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, whose governance has been criticized for its continuation of divisive colonial-like policies to maintain a vote bank. This political environment allowed for the escalation of communal tensions in Kashmir, which was largely ignored by the central government.
The situation further deteriorated under Prime Minister V.P. Singh, who, rather than addressing the rising communal unrest in Kashmir, initiated the implementation of the Mandal Commission’s recommendations. This decision led to significant national unrest and diverted attention from the critical issues in Kashmir, effectively sidelining the plight of the Pandits. This period not only showcased the negligence of the Indian government towards its minority communities but also underscored the continued influence of divisive politics, echoing colonial strategies.
These reflections on the broader context of political manipulations and divisions that have characterized significant moments in Indian history, such as the exodus of Kashmiri Pandits and the communal violence in Kohat, underscore the complexities and the enduring influence of political and historical legacies on contemporary Indian society. For a deeper exploration of related historical and policy discussions, including the critical assessment of post-independence leadership under Jawaharlal Nehru and the implications of the Indian Independence Act, you are encouraged to read our detailed analysis on ‘Jawaharlal Nehru Continues Legacy of British Raj in Post-Independence India‘. Further insights can also be found in our comprehensive section in the blog ‘India Independence Day Decided Seven Seas Away‘, which provides an in-depth look at how these historical events continue to shape India’s political landscape.
Impact and Exodus
The repercussions for the local communities in Kohat and Kashmir were devastating. The violence in Kohat led to the mass migration of Hindu and Sikh families, significantly altering the demographic composition and economic landscape of the area. The situation in Kashmir saw over 100,000 Kashmiri Pandits forced to leave their homes, resulting in a dramatic and painful fragmentation of a historically cohesive community.
Legacy and Ongoing Repercussions
The Kohat riots and the Kashmiri Pandit exodus have left enduring legacies that continue to affect communal relationships and political dialogues in their respective regions. Both events are frequently referenced as critical examples of the destructive impact of allowing extremist agendas to dominate, reflecting the profound human costs and the ongoing challenges in achieving reconciliation and justice.
Reflection of Riots in Kohat: Kashmir Exodus 1.0
The Kohat riots of 1924 serve as a powerful reminder of the destructive potential of communal conflict and the enduring impact of political strategies that exploit ethnic and religious divisions. This event highlighted the consequences of the British colonial divide and rule strategy, the complexities of the Indian National Congress’s involvement in the Khilafat Movement, and the resulting deepened communal rifts. The analysis of such historical events underscores the necessity of maintaining vigilance against similar divisive tactics in contemporary politics.
Understanding the history of communal violence, such as the Kohat riots, is essential for preventing similar conflicts in the future. Historical awareness can help societies recognize the early warning signs of communal tension and the potential consequences of political manipulation, guiding more informed and effective responses.
Call to Action
As we reflect on the lessons from the Kohat riots, it is crucial to consider the role of political leadership in fostering communal harmony. Leaders have a significant influence on how communities interact and how conflicts are managed. Effective leadership can bridge divides, while poor leadership can exacerbate tensions.
I invite you, the readers, to engage with this discussion by sharing your thoughts in the comments below. Have you observed instances where historical lessons have been successfully applied to prevent communal violence? Or perhaps you know of other historical events that offer lessons on how to handle such conflicts? Share your insights and personal experiences to enrich our understanding and collective memory, helping to ensure that the lessons from our past effectively inform our present and future actions.
Feature Image: Click here to view the image.
#KohatRiots #KashmiriPandits #CommunalViolence #IndianHistory #ColonialImpact
References
https://berkleycenter.georgetown.edu/posts/religious-and-communal-tensions-in-indian-politics
Leave a Reply