World War I and Devastation of Bharat

Table of Contents

Immediate Impact of World War I on Bharat

World War I, often referred to as “The Great War,” was not just a European conflict; it was a global event with far-reaching consequences, including in British-ruled Bharat. Though geographically distant from the main theaters of war, Bharat played a pivotal role in supporting the British Empire’s war effort. The repercussions of this involvement were profound, affecting every aspect of Bharatiya society, politics, and economy. As the war unfolded, it became clear that Bharat’s contribution was not without significant cost. This first part of the blog explores the immediate impact of World War I on Bharat, delving into the political awakening, the nationalist movement, and the socio-economic changes that laid the foundation for the country’s eventual struggle for independence.

Background or World War I

Before diving into the impact of World War I on Bharat, it is essential to understand the context in which the country found itself at the outbreak of the war. Bharat was under British colonial rule, a period marked by economic exploitation, social stratification, and political unrest. The Indian National Congress (INC), founded in 1885 with the encouragement of the British, initially aimed to serve as a platform for the colonial authorities to manage the growing discontent among Indians. While it appeared to advocate for the interests of Bharat, the INC’s early efforts were more aligned with seeking modest reforms within the colonial framework. The early 20th century saw increasing dissatisfaction with British rule. It was in this complex and controlled environment that Bharat was drawn into World War I, setting the stage for the seismic shifts that would follow.

Impact of World War I on Bharat

The broader consequences of World War I on Bharat extended beyond the battlefield, influencing the very fabric of Bharatiya society, politics, and economics. The war marked a crucial turning point in Bharat’s relationship with the British Empire, igniting a surge in nationalist sentiment that questioned the legitimacy of British rule. This period laid the groundwork for the organized struggle for independence, catalyzed by the shared experiences and collective disenchantment among the Bharatiya populace. The socio-economic repercussions were profound; inflation and scarcity of resources led to heightened economic distress, while the war’s demands disrupted traditional life across countless communities. The overarching impact of the war thus set the stage for Bharat’s push toward self-governance and reshaped its national identity.

Political Awakening and the Nationalist Movement

Many Bharatiya leaders, including Mahatma Gandhi and Bal Gangadhar Tilak, initially supported the British war effort, hoping that Bharat’s loyalty would be rewarded with political concessions and greater self-governance after the war. The British government, in turn, made vague promises of reform and greater autonomy for Bharat, fueling expectations among the Bharatiya populace.

However, the post-war period was marked by growing disillusionment and frustration. The British government’s failure to deliver on its promises of political reform, coupled with the repressive measures taken to maintain control, such as the Rowlatt Act of 1919, led to widespread resentment. The massacre at Jallianwala Bagh in April 1919, where British troops killed hundreds of unarmed Bharatiya protesters, became a symbol of British brutality and further galvanized the Bharatiya independence movement.

The war also exposed the contradictions of British rule in Bharat. While Bharatiya soldiers were fighting for freedom and democracy abroad, they were denied these very rights at home. This hypocrisy was not lost on Bharatiya leaders and the general population, leading to a growing demand for self-rule. The experiences of Bharatiya soldiers abroad also contributed to the rise of nationalist sentiment, as they returned home with a heightened awareness of the global struggle for independence and self-determination.

Social and Economic Impact

The social impact of World War I on Bharat was significant. The war led to increased social mobility as many Bharatiyas, especially from rural areas, were exposed to new ideas and experiences through their military service. This exposure broadened their horizons and, in some cases, led to a questioning of the rigid social hierarchies that had long defined Bharatiya society.

Economically, the war had devastating effects on Bharat. While the demands of the war stimulated certain industries, such as textiles and jute, the overall economic impact was detrimental. The British government imposed heavy taxes to finance the war, exacerbating the economic difficulties faced by the Bharatiya population. Additionally, the war disrupted trade, leading to shortages of essential goods and further inflation.

The economic hardships experienced during and after the war contributed to growing unrest among the Bharatiya population. Strikes, protests, and riots became more common as people expressed their dissatisfaction with British rule and the economic conditions in the country.

The Road to Independence

The legacy of World War I in Bharat was the acceleration of the independence movement. The war exposed the limits of British power and the vulnerability of the empire, encouraging Bharatiya nationalists to push more aggressively for self-rule.

The war also led to a shift in British attitudes towards Bharat. The economic and political strain of the war made it increasingly difficult for Britain to maintain control over its vast empire.

Gandhi’s Role During World War I

Return to India and Initial Support for the British War Effort:

Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi returned to Bharat from South Africa in 1915. While many critics of Gandhi believe that he was strategically placed by the British in Bharat to garner support for their war efforts in Europe, this theory has no conclusive evidence to substantiate it. However, these critics point to Gandhi’s earlier service to the British as a sergeant during the Boer War, where he supported the British cause against the local African population, as circumstantial evidence that he may have been implanted into Bharatiya politics by the British. Before Gandhi landed in Bharat, he already had several admirers among the senior leaders of the Indian National Congress (INC), including the influential Gopal Krishna Gokhale. This existing support within the INC leadership facilitated Gandhi’s swift rise in the Bharatiya political landscape upon his return, despite being relatively unknown to the broader public. His close association with these senior leaders quickly earned him the status of a senior Congress leader. However, while Gandhi outwardly supported British war efforts, he simultaneously preached the doctrine of non-violence to the poor and powerless Bharatiyas, a paradox that further fueled the critics’ theory that Gandhi was planted by the British to garner support for them in World War I.

During World War I, Gandhi supported the British war effort, believing that loyalty to the British during the war might lead to political concessions and greater autonomy for India after the conflict. He advocated for Indians to enlist in the British Army, presumably believing that military service would earn the Indian people the goodwill of the British government.

Recruitment Campaign:

In 1918, Gandhi launched a recruitment campaign to encourage Indians to join the British Army. He traveled across India, particularly in Gujarat, urging young men to enlist. Gandhi’s support for the British war effort was based on his belief that this would lead to a post-war settlement that would favor Indian political aspirations.

His stance, however, was controversial and met with criticism from other nationalist leaders, who were skeptical of the British government’s intentions.

Gandhi’s Disillusionment:

By the end of the war, Gandhi became increasingly disillusioned with the British government due to their repressive measures, such as the Rowlatt Act of 1919, which extended wartime restrictions into peacetime and allowed for the detention of individuals without trial.

The Jallianwala Bagh Massacre of 1919, where British forces brutally killed hundreds of unarmed Indian civilians, was a turning point that catalyzed Gandhi’s commitment to active non-cooperation, leading to the launch of the Non-Cooperation Movement in 1920. However, critics argue that Gandhi’s later reluctance to defend nationalist revolutionaries like Bhagat Singh, who were executed by the British, indicated a paradox in his stance against British repression, suggesting a complex interplay between his non-violent principles and the harsh realities of colonial rule.

Indian National Congress (INC) Leadership During World War I

Mixed Reactions to the War:

The leadership of the Indian National Congress during World War I was divided. Some leaders, like Bal Gangadhar Tilak, supported the war effort, hoping it would lead to political concessions from the British. The Congress was, at this time, more moderate in its approach, largely focusing on seeking reforms within the framework of British rule rather than outright independence.

Others were more skeptical and critical of the British war policies, recognizing that the war was a European conflict with little to do with India’s interests. However, the INC did not officially oppose the war.

Political Strategy:

The INC’s strategy during the war was to extract political concessions from the British in exchange for support. This led to the Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms in 1919, which introduced a limited degree of self-governance through the Government of India Act, 1919. However, these reforms were widely seen as insufficient, and dissatisfaction grew within the Congress ranks.

Reflections on Impact of World War I on Bharat

The immediate impact of World War I on Bharat was both profound and multifaceted. The war served as a catalyst for political awakening and the rise of nationalist sentiment, as Bharatiyas began to question the legitimacy of British rule more openly. The social and economic strains of the war exacerbated existing tensions, leading to widespread unrest and laying the groundwork for future resistance movements.

As we transition to the second part of this blog, we will explore how the aftermath of the war continued to shape Bharat’s journey toward independence and the lasting legacy of World War I on the nation.

Feature Image: Click here to view the image.